Georgia Post Basic Jail Officer Mandate Practice Test

Question: 1 / 400

What distinguishes quid pro quo harassment from hostile work environment harassment?

Intent and favor exchange

Quid pro quo harassment is characterized by a specific exchange of favors where a person in a position of power demands sexual favors in return for benefits, such as promotions, raises, or continued employment. The essence of this type of harassment is that it operates on a clear and direct trade-off between the harasser and the victim, primarily involving a request for sexual acts in exchange for something job-related.

In contrast, hostile work environment harassment does not involve a direct exchange or favor. Instead, it is characterized by conduct that creates an intimidating, hostile, or abusive work environment for an employee. This can involve a range of behaviors that may not be directly related to job benefits or opportunities, but which contribute to a workplace that is uncomfortable or threatening.

Thus, the key distinction lies in the intent and the nature of the interactions. Quid pro quo harassment implies a clear transactional relationship, while hostile work environment harassment encompasses broader behaviors that may not involve any direct or explicit job-related favor exchange. This understanding is crucial for recognizing and addressing different forms of harassment in the workplace.

Get further explanation with Examzify DeepDiveBeta

Frequency of occurrence

Nature of the offense

Amount of evidence required

Next Question

Report this question

Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy